Payment Bond Claim Notice Requires More than Mailing
There are a lot of requirements to
make a payment bond claim notice
other than mailing. One of those aspects is the 90 days notice requirement
which has to be fulfilled by the second tier or subcontractor or the supplier
who has no straight contractual relationship with the general contractor. There
have been several cases of failing to provide the notice which is taken into
consideration by the circuit court and is examined under the little miller act.
We at mechanics lien deal with a lot of cases of payment bond notice and
claims. Our team is always ready to advise you on the best steps after
examining the situation and always hopes to resolve the matter at the earliest.
There is a very popular case that
goes by the name of RT Atkinson building corp v archer western construction,
LLC. The court while referring closely to this case looked upon the matter of
whether it is right and legitimate to only mail the notice of claim instead of
giving it in a manner that ends up satisfying the statutory requirement. This
question of legitimacy has been doing rounds for quite a while. Now in the case,
we are discussing, the notice was mailed by the supplier within the 90 days of
time frame. But the one who was against the case argued that he only received
the notice on the 2nd day after the 90 days were over. He also tried
to make his argument a lot more legitimate and solid by providing a sort of proof.
The defendant while confirming the contention went further to provide the
tracking information of the mail by delivering the USPS on a non-compliant
date.
Though the argument made by the
plaintiff was rejected by the court stating that the method of service was
mailing and placing the notice of mail is enough and serve the legitimate
cause. The court further went on to state that-
Mentioning the mail as the method
of service does not establish the fact that mail is satisfying the prerequisite
to giving the notice. The court findings were summed up with clarity. The court
went on to clearly state that the notice would only be considered given when it
is finally been received by the claimant. It is not as If you send the mail and
now it does not matter that it went through or not. It is as important to make
sure that the claimant received the notice as to send the mail firsthand.
Also Read: How
to File a Mechanics Lien: The Ultimate Step by Step Guide
The court then went further and on
procedural grounds denied the summary judgment, which was found to be unrelated
to the concrete facts of mailing and receipts.
Now as we move toward the
conclusion of the case it is important to take note of a few important points
from this case. One has to be pretty clear about the fact that just mailing the
notice within 90 days won’t be enough on any ground and will not satisfy the
requirements of the little miller act of Virginia. People have been doing this
a lot when they assume that mailing is all they need to do and their part is
over. If in any such case the claimant does not receive the notice then it will
make the case critical. It is therefore important to keep these points in mind
before you send the notice of your payment
bond claim.
We at Mechanics Lien have one
of the most experienced teams who is happy to help you in many of such
law-related cases. If there is any such case of payment bond claim, we would be more than happy to help and advise
you to deal with such cases.
Original Source: https://bit.ly/3MiUWm7
Comments
Post a Comment